Sawahlunto sits in a fold of the Bukit Barisan so tight that the town seems to have been poured into the valley rather than built upon it. We arrived by a road that wound down through terraced hillsides into a settlement of tiled colonial roofs and blackened brick, the whole place wearing its nineteenth-century industrial bones with an almost eerie completeness: because the coal ran out, because the town was largely forgotten once it did, its entire layout survives intact in a way few other relics of Dutch extraction anywhere in the archipelago can match.
The Ombilin coal mine that built this town is Southeast Asia's oldest, opened by Dutch engineers in the 1890s to feed the steamships and locomotives of empire, its coal hauled 155 kilometres by specialised rack railway down to the port of Emmahaven on the coast, a line that was, by the reckoning of the engineers who built it, among the most complex railway projects in Southeast Asia at the turn of the century: the track climbed to 773 metres above sea level near Padang Panjang, then threaded the gorges, rivers and mountains of the Anai Valley on a system of rack-and-pinion gears, since ordinary locomotives could not grip steeply enough to climb these slopes, the whole route stitched together with tunnels, mountain-pass stations and steel bridges slung over the ravines, hauled by powerful locomotives shipped in mostly from Germany, with others from Britain, the United States and the Netherlands.
What the mine's Dutch administrators kept meticulous records of was tonnage: six hundred thousand tonnes a year at its 1939 peak, logged, audited, shipped. What they did not keep meticulous records of was death. The workforce here was stratified into three unequal tiers: daily-wage Minangkabau labourers, indentured contract workers brought from Java and recruited as far afield as Singapore and Penang, and, at the bottom, convict labourers shipped in chains from Dutch prisons across the archipelago, known as orang rantai, the chained people, worked until they died and identified afterwards, when they were identified at all, only by a number scratched into a stone rather than a name. The 2019 UNESCO evaluation that finally inscribed this site as a World Heritage property noted, in the understated language of heritage bureaucracy, that “there was considerable conflict between the three classes of labourers due to poor working conditions,” and, more tellingly, urged Indonesia to more visibly include these labourers in how the site tells its own story, since the social history of who actually mined this coal had for decades been eclipsed by admiration for the engineering that moved it.